heredos

@heredos@heredos.net

computer science student.

Birthdayas old as 2005 but born in 2004
Websitehttps://heredos.net
Batteriesincluded
gendernot installed
conditionlight scratches on the surface, cleaned yesterday evening
colorsorange, see-through shell
flagsred (as in communism is my country)

Location: 48.776396,2.335207

42 following, 26 followers

1 ★ 0 ↺

[?]heredos »
@heredos@heredos.net

audacity rant. [SENSITIVE CONTENT]@Li@tech.lgbt it's qt.
Qt runs on everything and is really easy to theme, i'm not too worried about that.

If the questions on the first startup are the price to pay for a better ux, i'd gladly spend the time it takes.

But yea, the logo sucks.
I can't even tell if it's a music player or a sound editor.

    ...
    1 ★ 0 ↺

    [?]heredos »
    @heredos@heredos.net

    audacity rant. [SENSITIVE CONTENT]Tbh, when i first heard about muse buying audacity, i wasn't expecting them to care enough about it for a full refactor. Or if they did, not an open source one. My expectations were that low, maybe that's why i'm pretty pleased with most of what they revealed.
    Also them trashtalking meta's products and AIs did score a hit :P

      ...

      [?]Li ~ Crystal System »
      @Li@tech.lgbt

      re: audacity rant. [SENSITIVE CONTENT]

      @heredos they literally added AI slop to the editor, as like a built in feature;

      and the "ux improvements" saying "it looks windows 8" is talking about the everything about it.

      also qt only runs on modern-ish versions of stuff, it has issues running on like windows xp and stuff (and also, becuase their going for not actually os native controls, even if you do theme your OS, the theme of the program won't match that...)

      it visually, looks like. a massive downgrade ... and the desire to remove modal functionality and workflow in favour of it just 'guessing' what you want to do; makes it generally one functionality wise too ...

        ...
        0 ★ 0 ↺

        [?]heredos »
        @heredos@heredos.net

        re: audacity rant. [SENSITIVE CONTENT]@Li@tech.lgbt not going to talk about ai since i'm not going to use it, and it's hidden in submenus enough that i am allowed to ignore it (which is rare enough today)

        As for the rest, theme design is not UX design at all.
        I don't remember the old audacity ever matching my system theme so eh, what i do remember is it being a pain of browsing through tutorials and documentation to be able to do what i want to do with it. If i can make it do what i want it to do, without thinking too much about it, and no functionality is lacking, i'm not going to complain.
        Sure, i'll have to relearn some things, but people who will start with it today won't have to spend as much time reading and rereading scarce documentation, i think it's a good thing?

        os-wise, i don't know people seriousely daily driving things that qt does not support. Or if they do (i.e. my grandma), they have long since switched from xp to some linux distro with the help of some it person (which wasn't even me, how sad).
        But i'm pretty sure you can find a qt qpa that will allow audacity to run on xp or even 95. But that's a stretch, if you really do use such outdated oses, you likely also use just as outdated software. And then again, 3.7 (which isn't out yet) will still be supported for a while

          History