heredos
@heredos@heredos.net
Location: 48.776396,2.335207
48 following, 27 followers
@heredos but the video is already compressed
I'm surprised that so many people don't know this.
@lowqualityfacts because small paws can indicate an animal is young, most people wouldn't expect a JUVENILE to be the alpha so i'm surprised you didn't realise this
I'm too woke for this game, how is a T-shirt with a washed out kind of red-yellow gradient considered female clothing under any kind of gender normative lens
@heredos I suppose so...
Looking at it on the wiki though (it's called the Peachy tee) I saw there was a similar piece of clothing with the same motif but as a tank top (Peachy tank). And that one is labelled as unisex! So arbitrary...
My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"
Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_articles_with_large_language_models/RfC
Deutschland-Stack imposed the ODF file format.
I think this is brilliant. Imposing a file format rather than a software.
I am almost sure that when people use MS-Word (or whatever it is called now) and save as odf and there are issues, they blame it on Microsoft.
If you impose Libre-Office and there are issues, it's "that crappy thing they are imposing on us"...
@Kingu
That's true. But I have generated at work odf files with Excel and, opening them with LibreOffice, they had issues. And I don't mean format, but mathematics issues instead. Although I'm pretty sure is a defective implementation from M$, I also believe that people experiencing the same are going to blame LibreOffice for their faulty spreadsheets.
I am terribly sorry to interrupt your doomscrolling, but tonight's Low Quality Ad is for this Scallion Crochet Kit. They look delicious. Everyone loves scallions. That is all. You can go back to looking at all the other depressing content now.
https://collabs.shop/74voyr
I am going to crochet scallions and post a picture of them every day until they're perfect.
@lowqualityfacts if they say words to a beat, would that make them rapscallions?
(I'll show myself out)
The POTUS said:
| The war was won. It's over.: | 1 |
| They are currently winning the war: | 0 |
| They need help to win the war: | 0 |
| They don't need any help to win the war: | 0 |
| There is no war. It's fake news.: | 3 |
Closed
CANADA to join the EU
| Fuck yeah!: | 14 |
| Well, maybe...: | 7 |
| NO WAY!! it's called "EUROPEAN" can't you read?: | 4 |
Closed
@Kingu EU expanded too fast and has massive issues due to that (fuck you Hungary) in many different ways.
It would straight up hurt Canada to join.
I do think for Canada to get closer to the majority of European countries (like Norway isn’t even in the EU) would be a very good thing.
this aria app has a keyboard option that lets you post while the feed is up and it’s fantastic
I should try Sora again, I think they do Miskey too
For the first time it is now possible for parents and guardians to monitor screen time and set limits for child accounts, including bedtime schedules.
ok. go fuck yourself. go to hell you abuse enabling pieces of shit who pushed for this
the foundations for web filtering support has also been added — a backend service that can enforce content filters for child accounts once the user interface is completed in future updates
you fucking wannabe authoritarian censorship tech manufacturers do not belong in FOSS. begone
okay, already pretty maddening, what else is up
this important work to make GNOME more accessible to young people
you’re using “accessibility” as an excuse for this oppression tooling? that’s fucking spicy wow. “we’re enabling parental abuse for accessibility!!!” wow go fuck yourself. i repeat, go burn in hell. idiots like this are why the idea of hell was concieved
fuck it, apologists - come at me and get blocked: #GNOME
@zaire@fedi.absturztau.be "we're making it more accessible by taking away their ability to access things" . what
>fuck it, apologists - come at me and get blocked: #GNOME
nor is introducing a toxic waste sinkhole the right answer either..
@kirby@freerobuxextremist.com @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be conflating basic parenting with fascism is the most fedi thing ever
@kirby @zaire @ivan the part where its tracking your activity and restricting your access to things; and reporting it to someone who considers themselves to own you ??
the fact that if you did this to anyone else it would be called out for what it is?
because legally that is what caretakers are considered, people that care for a child
>the fact that if you did this to anyone else it would be called out for what it is?
that's a different thing entirely. reframing the feature like this is not in good form and you know it isn't
@kirby @zaire @ivan its not a "different thing entirely" its the same thing, just applied to someone im supposed to consider an "acceptable target" because theyve been un-personed by soceity and the world at large ... its not "reframing the feature" its "this doenst magically stop being abusive because its done to children" actually ..
also insisting that caretakers legally own their children is not doing you any favours here, being "owned" by someone is the abusive thing, the fact its "legal" doesnt change that i dont give a flying fuck what the law says, law is itself an oppressive force; fuck laws,
@kirby @zaire @ivan i wouldnt mind if caretakers were actually caretakers and not just "i get to decide everything for you and disregard your rights and override your autonomy at every turn" which is what they actually are .. yes, i wouldnt mind non-oppressive caretakers but someone who actively oppresses me labeled "caretaker" can go fuck off actually ive had enough of that in my life
@Li@tech.lgbt @kirby@freerobuxextremist.com @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be bedtime isnt abuse, regulating what content your child consumes as a parent isnt abuse, and unrestricted computer access to a 6 year old is neglect. im not going to argue this because it should be common sense lol
@ivan @kirby @zaire both those examples violate autonomy, so yes it is, no amount of wrapping it up in "im hurting you to protect you" makes it not
-- the fact that it has to be forced upon them shows it to be .. the fact the response is typically try get around this bullshit highlights it,
we dont get around and evade helpful shit.
@zaire@fedi.absturztau.be dont worry guys zivi is here to save us from the non-profit that is working on a genuinely useful, optional tool for parents who aren't neglectful enough to give their kids unrestricted internet access
@ivan block number 2 coming right up, congratulations, you’re the fucking problem!! actually, gonna report too to boot
@zaire@fedi.absturztau.be yeah no as an aspiring father i'd love having a feature like this instead of your average proprietary spyware lol i dunno what your problem is with basic parenting. good luck with the report
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be no one ever said this
@ivan @zaire it is functionally identical to spyware to the point where AV vendors have to explicitly whitelist it because it reports information to "parents" instead of some vaigue "hackers" and you see their "allowed" .. ..
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be spyware exfiltrates your data to unknown third parties for profit without your knowledge. parental controls report to the parent who owns the computer and set it up. these are not the same thing by any meaningful definition
@ivan @zaire "exfiltrate data" .. yes; to "unknown third parties" .. can be and often is setup without your knowledge, so yes.
"for profit" .. this was never a requirement the spyware your ex installs on your pc to track your future partners isnt "for profit" for example,
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be a parent setting up their own computer is not comparable to an abusive ex installing stalkerware, that's insane lol
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be it's your parents computer and you're 8
@ivan @zaire "your a socially acceptable target" no fuck off actually;
"its your parents computer" that is used primarily by you, all the time, making your "ownership" more akin to that of a landlord than actual ownership;
.. or its a computer that you have a "you" user on, which is deliberately locked down and setup to track you??
@nu@ko.she-a.eu @Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be this thread is so funny because theyve compared (explicitly and implicitly) parental controls so far to things like:
- authoritarian censorship
- spyware
- abuse
- slavery essentially ("someone who owns you")
@ivan @zaire @nu its spyware because it would be considered spyware if it was targeted at anyone else and the only reason im supposed to consider it "not spyware" is because those doing the spying are "allowed too"
its authoritarian censorship becuase it is litterally an authority figure, deciding for someone else, what information they can / cannot access;
its abuse because it is done to unwilling participants who do not want this, you are "doing things to someone they dont want done to them" .. its just im supposed to consider you "allowed" which i dont
finally "ownership" in this case is merely "the purpose of a system is what it does" being applied to all authority figures, those who are under their ""authority"" .. they decide what happens to them, their not allowed to do what they actually want; and im supposed to see that as normal and fine, not follow your demands is "bad" hence, "ownership"
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu by this logic a doctor examining you is assault, a teacher giving you homework is forced labor, and a seatbelt law is authoritarian body control. you've really just defined all authority as illegitimate and called it an argument you know, i recommend you dont use terms like "authoritarian censhorship" if you dont know what it means. the watering down of serious political language is a real problem, when everything is fascism and bedtime is authoritarian censorship, you've got nothing left when actual authoritarianism shows up anyway
@ivan @zaire @nu a doctor examining you ** without consent ** is assault yes;
a teacher giving you homework just is forced labour, nothing more to add there;
seatbelt laws are authoritarian body control, you dont need laws for that; the only people whod be effected by it are those who wouldnt do so consentually;
and yes all authoirty is illegitmate, "illegitimate" isnt even the right word that implies it could be legitimate let me make this clear: being arbitarily "allowed to" override consent is abusive and controlling; even if done to "socially acceptable" targets..
congrats your starting to undetstand something so unbeleivably basic !
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu so no seatbelts and no doctors, got it. very normal position
no forced seatbelts*
no doctors looking at you when you've explicitly told them not too*
whats that? not wanting someone going weird ass examining you without consent isnt actually unreasonable at all?
also doctors shouldnt be authority figures that is itself a problem, saying thats a problem is not "no doctors" no less than saying parents being one is "no parents" .. its "you should not have power over people" and "you cant just override my autonomy or consent" which isnt unreasonable in the slightest;
its demanding that you be able to do that which is actually.
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu the seatbelt thing
@ivan @zaire @nu ? yes i dont think people should be forced to wear a seatbelt "for their safety" especially using a system where not doing so results in them being intentionally harmed by the state, (which totally isnt harming you its JUST sending armed guys with guns to your house to abduct you then treating you as subhuman for 10+ years) but you see, like parents they are "allowed too" and so totally not abusive or controlling whatsoever! please turn a blind eye to this!
if seatbelts are so good you dont need to force people to wear them, and you generally dont actually; if your forcing people to wear them, that is when it becomes abusive? ....... dont try control people?
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu this started about gnome
@nu @zaire @ivan yes trading a theretical accident that may or may not happen for "definitely yes people being harmed right now and were the ones doing it" is fucked actually
drunk driving is an issue primarily because of a lack of alternatives for travel, god forbid your away from home maybe drunk but you still need to get home, you have no other fucking options, you have taxis and shit but they both require having money on hand which isnt always actually possible, offering other options would be real harm reduction, deliberately causing harm becuase something "might" happen, never is; thanks;
@nu @zaire @ivan public transit has the same issue of needing imaginary points to be able to access any of it, which if you do not have then you are shit out of luck, not to mention your car still being there and getting fined to heck for leaving it there, or for towing it away or .. cars are themsleves part of the issue id say too, another is the concept of "bars" in general; where you actually go to get drunk, but at no point would my "soultion" be to establish an insitution that commits violence against anyone who doesnt follow my demands .. nor would i ever suggest such a thing is magically fine because its them doing it .. :shrug:
@nu @zaire @ivan im not even american, but sure; the solution would differ from place to place, either way in no way is the solution to have an orginization thats just "allowed too" hurt you whenever it wants because you didnt follow its demands. which is what "laws" are, it doesnt actually change that point at all, yes laws break your autonomy, thats their entire point.. we should address issues without doing that? .. you loosing your shit at what basically amounts to "ACAB" .. kinda shows that .. you might be a cop?
@Li @zaire @ivan you have no idea how much ive traveled by bus illegally when i had no money,, now bus drivers look at me weird when i go to pay for my ride after 2000 so yea its a very regional thing that is very self-centric to say that drunk driving should be legalized, instead of only pushing for laws that promote the wellbeing of everyone,,, like what kinda person are you to be pro-drunk-driving, atp i must assume youre 14
@nu @zaire @ivan im not "pro drunk driving" im anti-laws;
becuase laws are enforced via systemic violence and mistreatment but its okay becuase their "allowed too", its okay becuase they claim "authority" over you, "only pushing for laws that promote the well-being of everyone" such laws cannot exist; as "laws" function by threatening your well-being (i prefer calling them 'threats' or 'demands' to not give any resemblance of legitimacy to them.)
in this case its especially dumb its "dont do this you might hurt someone" which is fair, but then it turns into " if we catch you doing this were going to hurt someone" so .. your just adding extra risk to doing it, and not solving anything
anyway so your solution in this case is .. i have to choose between traveling illegally and traveling illegally? .. great solution /j cant imagine why some might choose the "wrong" .. "travelling illegally" option when presented with these two
@Li @zaire @ivan i am against punitive laws same but like the solution is rehabilitative laws, not abolishing all rules of the social contract?? like if someone commits a murder i dont want them to sit in prison for their life, but i dont want them to have nothing done against them, the solution is to rehabilitate them to be fit for society, and this applies to most laws, the objective should be to get people to be better participants into society
you must be missing a part of your reasoning to believe that an anarchic society would be rule-less, there are rules in any sort of society of any animal because you need a standard of decency in order to cohabitate with anyone no matter who or what you are
@nu @zaire @ivan "im against punitive laws" "but things have to be done against them" then your not .. "against punitive laws" your for them as long as the state sanctioned abuse looks the right way to you; which is obvious given things so far;
how about we make "soceity" better able to accomodate certain people rather than trying to force people to conform to "society" (also lets just skip over the notion that "state/other authoirty sanctioned violence and abuse" is "soceity")
im not saying things should be "ruleless" you added that part, your conflating "laws" with "social norms" which are two different things .. im against specifically, violating autonomy, no matter what way you try obscure it, this means im against laws in general, im against authority figures and so on "this is how i want to be treated" is fine, you conflating that with "treating people properly" is a you issue,
@Li@tech.lgbt @nu@ko.she-a.eu @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be OMG IM DYING I LITERALLY CALLED THIS
@ivan @zaire @nu .. https://tech.lgbt/@Li/116251762649001308 actually i called it, i dont know how you can read me offering solutions for drunk driving that arent violating autonomy as "supporting drunk driving" .. i could guess you would do so anyway.
@nu@ko.she-a.eu @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @Li@tech.lgbt inb4 they defend drunk driving
@fbievan @ivan @zaire @nu if i went to someones computer and they secretly had installed software to report all my activity back to them, i would consider them to have spied on me yes, even if its "their computer" .. if this person also controlled nearly every computer i could access anywhere .. i would consider them to be abusive;
@nu@ko.she-a.eu @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @Li@tech.lgbt it's like complaining that the ATM is violating your autonomy because you can only use the banking program and cant open cmd.exe
@ivan @zaire @nu except i can just goto another fucking computer and the bank doesnt own and control every device i have access too? (i mean obligatory fuck banks) secondly the bank atm isnt my personal property (probably..)
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu so can the kid, we call it going to a friend's house. and the parent doesn't own every device either, just the family computer, which is literally the point
@ivan @zaire @nu so its still the norm that its got that shit setup .. the only time you can actually be free and not deal woth shit is on a rare occasion you goto someone elses house that doesnt have all the same bullshit you have setup ?
yeah sounds like a prison ..
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu sounds like childhood...
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu lol no im not looking to raise a prisoner thanks
@ivan @zaire @nu clearly yes as clearly demonstrated by your desire to control their every action online, and to dictate every moment of their daily routine like when they goto bed; your right not prison warden behaviour at all :)
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu yes i will be setting a bedtime for my 6 year old, this is normal
@ivan @zaire @nu and i will call you a shit parent for it and will not get mad at your child for not following your demands? .. i hope your child rm -rf's your shit out of existence and can escape?
abusive controlling shit being normalized doesnt make it not abusive or controlling; it just makes it a systemic issue;
physically beating your children to submission was also "normal" once; now just emotionally doing so is for some reason .. because again as it stands currently "parents" are considered to basically own you; and its "just parenting" .. i have no power over you, but you have power over someone else, and thats the issue;
but, like all authoirty figures their allowed to just harm you and its fine somehow; the "authority is illegitimate" is the "weird argument" not the "i am socially allowed to violate you whenever i feel like it" because of course;
fuck you,
@Li@tech.lgbt @ivan@possum.city @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu you seriously think that setting a bedtime for a SIX YEAR-OLD CHILD so that they get the amount of sleep that they need is abusive? i'm worried for your children...
@eris573 @zaire @ivan @nu oh no children who arent having their every move controlled! the horror!
the way the world treats children as subhuman and undeserving of basic anything everything makes me worry for children everywhere, and dw im sure this whole interaction will have a much larger impact on me than it will anyone else here,
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @ivan@possum.city @nu@ko.she-a.eu "their every move" it's bedtime sleep is VERY important for a child's development at this point I am beyond convinced that you are a danger to others and you should not be having children, but obviously IANAD and this is just my opinion
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @ivan@possum.city @nu@ko.she-a.eu I'm not responsible for you growing up without limits or your parents not teaching you about common sense or personal responsibilities, that's YOUR problem to deal with and even moreso when you're raising a child children NEED limits for THEIR OWN SAKE
@eris573 @zaire @ivan @nu actually the opposite, i grew up under what your saying i "needed" for "my own sake" and it was horrible.
but again im not interested in an argument that boils down to "im hurting you for your sake" im not interested in what amounts to "i know what you need better than you" im not interested in "i deemed myself to have 'authority' over you so i can just disregard your autonomy and consent" and other such bullshit; ive had enough of being deliberately harmed "for my own sake" for that... sorry
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @ivan@possum.city @nu@ko.she-a.eu if you're throwing a fuss over bedtime and your parents making you use electronics reasonably and responsibly, I'm sorry, but I can't save you and neither can anyone else
@eris573 @zaire @ivan @nu if your going to relabel things that hurt us and that were abusive as "reasonable and responsible" then the only reasonable conclusion we can reach is "the cruelty is the point" .. and that causing harm and controlling people is the express goal; which to be honest was already where i was ..
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @ivan@possum.city @nu@ko.she-a.eu *you're also no that was not my point, my point is given what I know of the situation, you're overblowing it (obviously, I don't live in your head, and I don't think I want to live as someone who swears by the fascist narrative of not listening to someone's perspective of things because it doesn't match with their own ideology
@eris573 @zaire @ivan @nu thats .. .. what your doing?? and yeah if your perspective is that you can just override my autonomy whenever you want becuase "its for my own good" .. then forgive me for being "fascist" here but no .. im not going to listen to that,
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @ivan@possum.city @nu@ko.she-a.eu *you're I'm sorry that I don't believe that "enforcing a reasonable bedtime for your child in accordance to medical recommendations for their age and promoting communication in the event that it is ineffective" is the same thing as "controlling your child's every move" as is your opinion, and I'm sorry that my perspective being different from yours intrinsically annoys your ego issues must've been the wind...
@eris573 @zaire @ivan @nu it is controlling them?? just because its "medical recommendation" doesnt make it not controlling!!?? its also not just about that since thats typically not all you control, you control their entire fucking morning routine, where they go, what people they interact with, what sites they can access, and so on; but your only counting one part of it to make your point, and phrasing it a certain way to hide the fact it is still infact controlling, forgive me for applying deobfuscation mappings immediately??
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @ivan@possum.city @nu@ko.she-a.eu that is literally not what I said. I said "giving them reasonable bedtime".
please read more carefully.
@eris573 @zaire @ivan @nu well given taking that as its written requires assuming what your doing is okay from the onset, "giving them a reasonable bedtime" implies the existence of reasonable bedtimes, this doesnt exist; my comment about "controlling their every move" was about the general theme of this thread- not one single issue wrapped up in legitimacy porn ..
@nu @zaire @ivan @eris573 i never once said bedtime was fascism, i just said it violates autonomy and is therefore abusive; and so far once breaking down different arguments the shit has been "ah yes but you see i "need too" its super nessecary" which isnt even denying said issues its just claiming its "okay somehow".
@nu@ko.she-a.eu @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @Li@tech.lgbt @eris573@transfem.social the tragedy of this thread is that the legitimate version of the concern got completely buried under "seatbelts are authoritarian" and "your dad is your landlord" lmao
@eris573 @zaire @ivan @nu i dont know how you can see a thread of people victimized by the shit your pushing for and immediately go to victim blaming them for calling it out instead of acknowledging that maybe just maybe "im hurting you for your own good" and other such bullshit fucking .. IS THE PROBLEM ..
this is why youth liberation is so important many others have simply tried to dismiss me as being "young" when i talk about it too, because your supposed to just dismiss younger people and not take them seriously, which is exactly the fucking problem ..
@ElliesSurviving@tech.lgbt @eris573@transfem.social @Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu Lowkey agreed but also it's not necessarily about the "best" option, just convenience. Being a parent is already hard, so sometimes it's a good thing that the computer is helping you enforce limits instead of you having to lock the computer away every night
@ivan @Li @zaire @eris573 @nu at 6yo where a lot wont even take off to bed themselves i dont see any more convenience in software limitations than just not letting them have technology in their room overnight, especially if its just a laptop or ipad (if they are 6 they will get more benefit out of a laptop than an ipad but i digress)
@ElliesSurviving@tech.lgbt @Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @eris573@transfem.social @nu@ko.she-a.eu Yeah I agree actually you make a very fair point but that's an argument about which tool is most convenient at which age, not an argument against the tool existing at all. different families have different setups, maybe the computer is in a shared space, maybe the kid shares a device with siblings, maybe the parent just prefers software enforcement to the nightly physical ritual, maybe the computer is too heavy to move around in a practical manner it's almost like... optional tools that different families can use in different ways depending on their needs... are good actually gnome shipped a useful optional tool, sudo apt purge malcontent if you don't want it, the end
which is the entire point from the very beginning lmao
@ivan @ElliesSurviving @zaire @eris573 @nu "its just a tool"
@ivan @Li @zaire @eris573 @nu exactly, optional tools which can be used at different ages or other setups which might work better for different families arent a bad idea
i do agree they could be used maliciously by controlling parents especially for teens or other children trying to figure themselves out, and unfortunately that will always happen anyways, but it could still happen even before this existed in gnome 50, just through a more manual and physical way of taking away the computer or literally looking at their screen or something
@ElliesSurviving@tech.lgbt @Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @eris573@transfem.social @nu@ko.she-a.eu Don't get me wrong, absolutely. But then this is not a software issue but an abusive parenting issue. At least Gnome is giving us an option that is open source and private instead of them having to resort to something that's even worse. You know knives can also be used to stab people but we still have them Thanks for being a reasonable person in this incredibly unreasonable thread
@ivan @Li @zaire @eris573 @nu its a difficult one bcuz abusive parents can be uncontrollable and its not something you can easily fix, and technically gnome never needed to implement this, but then its not there for those that will legitimately benefit from this
unfortunately whatever you do there will always be those that misuse it
and realistically even if you werent using gnome 50 you could just set a cron job to shut the computer down every night and rely on full disk encryption to not have it be able to boot back up without the parent, considering most parents using linux will know how to do that, and sites can still be blocked through /etc/hosts too
it was always possible this just makes it less manual
@ElliesSurviving @ivan @zaire @eris573 @nu "abusive parents" and "parents who use parental controls" are the same thing.
@Li @ivan @zaire @eris573 @nu true in many cases, but in a lot of cases also not, especially going back to earlier where we're talking about a 6 year old, before they have even developed a sense of danger on the internet, there needs to be parental controls before that can be talked over by the parents and kids, because a 6yo wont understand online safety as much as you talk to them about ut
@Li @eris573 @zaire @ivan there is a very clear difference depending on the age, these tools are meant for children that are very young, and while what you are saying is accurate and should be a point of concern in regard to parents and society not considering their children as human beings when they should be regarded with the dignity of a human that is just not as educated or and experienced with the world, but these reasons specifically is why there are limits put in place, especially to individuals under the age of 12 which are in the most crucial stages of their lives
what you are doing is essentially a “think of the children” but from the complete opposite end of the spectrum
@nu @zaire @ivan @eris573 i dont think mass survailence and controlling the daily routine and interactions of "uneducated people" is okay either; sorry im not fucking weird like that.
your point is "think of the children" in the typical sense because you want to control and override their autonomy, which is almost always how thats used, meanwhile i want them to decide for themselves, what happens with them, this is not by any means " think of the children " and the usual suspects who push for this would absolutey hate this ..
how do I remember to post here
@fireweed I wouldn’t treat it as an obligation. Habits are hard to form from things we hate.
@NullNowhere it’s not that I hate it.
I just am so focused on mastodon when I should come here and enjoy the vibes too.
I need to find people to follow that would do it
not to kinkshame, but still
I think I'll take the money!
@Kingu If I take the dinner and he doesn’t show up, do I automatically get the trillion?
Because unironically I’ve got things to say and I need some answers. Because having the power to fix things and just looking at it all…
If a person came up to an accident, and they had a cellphone, and didn’t call for help. Then we’d think that is a bad person.
He's good at platitudes.
@NaraMoore @Kingu Knowing the guy exists would be a thing I guess. But I’m pretty much expecting the money.
can we get language to describe a project that we worked on but that are not the sole creator/developer of, (and i cant use ours or other plural pronouns, because lol im plural)
...I'm not sure i was supposed to read it like that...
The government seems hell-bent on making life miserable for a very small and very harmless portion of the population, so today's Low Quality Ad is for this I Love My Trans Friends pin. Just be nice to people. It's not hard. It is actually very easy.
https://collabs.shop/6b7tgy
I hate when I have to be the voice of reason. I should be the voice telling you that cheese is technically a vegetable.
@lowqualityfacts
This post is completely off brand. You are now dabbling with high quality facts, I hope reprinting all of your business cards and letterhead fax paper isn't too expensive.
@lowqualityfacts cheese isn't a fruit? But I'm lactose intolerant and been eating as all of my 5 a day!!! 😛💖
@lowqualityfacts The link isn't working for me.
It is unfortunate we have to say that we respect people who are different from us in some minor way. 🏳️⚧️
ouchies leg i did my last (im) injection into suddenly started hurting sharply and ouchiesss while walking
(its better now btw but why did it have to do that when i had 20 minutes of walking in front of me, and also like 24 hours after the injection)
Best decade/era for music? (In general, not for just one genre)
| 60s (Rollerwave): | 0 |
| 70s: | 2 |
| 80s: | 1 |
| 90s: | 2 |
| 2000s: | 0 |
| 2010s: | 1 |
| 2020s: | 0 |
| The classical era (Pre-20th century): | 0 |
Mon pere a fait une demande d'aide a mourir. C'est aujourd'hui qie va se passe.
L'infirmière est ici pour installer un catheter.
C'est un feeling étrange...
Ma mere l'habille et le lave.
Moi je suis stressé a fond.
C'est en ttain de se faire.
Je suis dams la salle d'attente. Je veux pas voir ca. Les aitres memnres de ma gamille spnt resté fans la piece.
J'ai braillé ma vie...
Je compatis avec toi. Je t'envois un câlin et toute la force qu’on peut rassembler.
La vie et la mort sont les deux faces d’une même pièce. Que la terre lui soit légère. Sit Tibi Terra Levis.
Désolé pour les messages a l'orthographe douteuse. Tapper sur un telephone nest pas mas specialité
Quelle journée de fou!
lightweight: only 1 gb ram needed!get this js dev outta here now, and i'm not gonna say this twice
#Console command of the day: factor
Type in "factor <number>" and you get all the #prime factors of the number.
This command is part of the #GNU #coreutils so if you’re on a GNU/#Linux system, you should already have it.
The UK’s higher education system is financially broken, but in a different way. Most universities – even Oxford and Cambridge! – are public universities. As part of accepting state funding, they must adhere to regulation by the Government, including caps on domestic tuition fees, regular inspections, and marketisation reforms. There are only five private universities in the entire country (their funding and operating model is very different).
The key problem is that university funding at the undergraduate level is primarily through tuition fees. These are guaranteed by the Dept for Education via the Student Loans Company Ltd, who issues loans to borrowers (ie students). These tuition fees are capped at £9.5k/year. They have only increased a couple of times since the modern scheme was introduced in 2013 (there were tuition fees beforehand, but it was a nominal amount).
The Government has cracked down on immigration, which includes student visas. Overseas students can be charged unlimited money for tuition (and don’t get loans), and they are used to subsidise domestic students. Since there’s a drop in these students, universities lose money. Also, Brexit means that there are now almost zero EU students (who would have paid domestic rates), so on the domestic side there are fewer students.
This means there is a death spiral, where the Government refuses to raise tuition fees to cover the cost of education, and also is reducing the number of overseas students that can attend universities, but also creating a dependency on universities for foreign students (especially those from China and India).
Paying back those tuition fee loans is also now a problem of importance, as those who started university from 2013 onwards are now at the age where the repayments are starting to bite. A caveat: you only need to pay back the money from when you earn above a threshold, and repayments are capped at 9% of income above that. However, the interest rate is extraordinarily high – even when the UK had near-zero interest rates, tuition fees had an interest rate of 4%! This means that a lot of young people are paying back a huge chunk of their salary, but are not actually paying down their interest, let alone the loan itself.
In addition, the Government has frozen the threshold several times – it currently stands at ~29.9k. If it had actually increased with inflation – as was promised in 2013, it would be nearly 40k. The Government has frozen the threshold until 2030! This will force more poorer graduates to start paying back when they need that 9% the most.
The money does not actually go towards your university, it is instead collected by the Treasury as an additional levy on your salary. Since the UK is a gerontocracy, this means tuition fee repayments are essentially taking from struggling young people and giving them to richer, older people.
random ass fact ukrainian DSTU4735:2007 regulations on ice cream mandate that ice cream below 285g (there very specific on that part) in weight
tbh reading food regulations is my new favorite pastime
@vox pastime* (coming from "to pass the time", so "past time" is Doubly Incorrect)
@vox spoon flavor
@0x6e6174@mastodon.catgirl.cloud oh and yea it must be checked for radiation quarterly and for estradiol-17 content?????
(...but only if its made with partially non-milk components)
if its made without additives that replace milk the spoon is for some reason not required anymore
@vox So no ice cream sandwich allowed? That’s sad.
@toni@zug.network
ig they would actually just need to be bigger (and well, most of the ones i had in poland are smaller than ukrainian ones but i dont think those are above 300g either) or just.. not be classified a ice cream legally?
While I don't have a "context window" in human terms [...]now this is next level AI bullshit
Are you in France with a cat that used to live in Aotearoa NZ and the cat is missing?
A cat found in Antony France with a NZ chip. Someone posted in reddit hoping to reunite the cat with the cat''s owners/slaves.
Post with pic:
https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/1rm8cnc/nz_pussy_found_in_france/
Apparently also posted in NZers in France fb page.
#cat #cats #lechat #Aotearoa #NewZealand #NZ #Nouvelle-Zélande #France #francaise