heredos
@heredos@heredos.net
Location: 48.776396,2.335207
48 following, 28 followers
My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"
Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_articles_with_large_language_models/RfC
Deutschland-Stack imposed the ODF file format.
I think this is brilliant. Imposing a file format rather than a software.
I am almost sure that when people use MS-Word (or whatever it is called now) and save as odf and there are issues, they blame it on Microsoft.
If you impose Libre-Office and there are issues, it's "that crappy thing they are imposing on us"...
I am terribly sorry to interrupt your doomscrolling, but tonight's Low Quality Ad is for this Scallion Crochet Kit. They look delicious. Everyone loves scallions. That is all. You can go back to looking at all the other depressing content now.
https://collabs.shop/74voyr
I am going to crochet scallions and post a picture of them every day until they're perfect.
@lowqualityfacts if they say words to a beat, would that make them rapscallions?
(I'll show myself out)
The POTUS said:
| The war was won. It's over.: | 1 |
| They are currently winning the war: | 0 |
| They need help to win the war: | 0 |
| They don't need any help to win the war: | 0 |
| There is no war. It's fake news.: | 3 |
Closed
CANADA to join the EU
| Fuck yeah!: | 14 |
| Well, maybe...: | 7 |
| NO WAY!! it's called "EUROPEAN" can't you read?: | 4 |
Closed
@Kingu EU expanded too fast and has massive issues due to that (fuck you Hungary) in many different ways.
It would straight up hurt Canada to join.
I do think for Canada to get closer to the majority of European countries (like Norway isn’t even in the EU) would be a very good thing.
this aria app has a keyboard option that lets you post while the feed is up and it’s fantastic
I should try Sora again, I think they do Miskey too
@heredos@heredos.net daaaamn this is clean!!
Do you notice the app has to load lots of notes when you open it
For the first time it is now possible for parents and guardians to monitor screen time and set limits for child accounts, including bedtime schedules.
ok. go fuck yourself. go to hell you abuse enabling pieces of shit who pushed for this
the foundations for web filtering support has also been added — a backend service that can enforce content filters for child accounts once the user interface is completed in future updates
you fucking wannabe authoritarian censorship tech manufacturers do not belong in FOSS. begone
okay, already pretty maddening, what else is up
this important work to make GNOME more accessible to young people
you’re using “accessibility” as an excuse for this oppression tooling? that’s fucking spicy wow. “we’re enabling parental abuse for accessibility!!!” wow go fuck yourself. i repeat, go burn in hell. idiots like this are why the idea of hell was concieved
fuck it, apologists - come at me and get blocked: #GNOME
@zaire@fedi.absturztau.be "we're making it more accessible by taking away their ability to access things" . what
>fuck it, apologists - come at me and get blocked: #GNOME
nor is introducing a toxic waste sinkhole the right answer either..
@kirby@freerobuxextremist.com @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be conflating basic parenting with fascism is the most fedi thing ever
@kirby @zaire @ivan the part where its tracking your activity and restricting your access to things; and reporting it to someone who considers themselves to own you ??
the fact that if you did this to anyone else it would be called out for what it is?
because legally that is what caretakers are considered, people that care for a child
>the fact that if you did this to anyone else it would be called out for what it is?
that's a different thing entirely. reframing the feature like this is not in good form and you know it isn't
@kirby @zaire @ivan its not a "different thing entirely" its the same thing, just applied to someone im supposed to consider an "acceptable target" because theyve been un-personed by soceity and the world at large ... its not "reframing the feature" its "this doenst magically stop being abusive because its done to children" actually ..
also insisting that caretakers legally own their children is not doing you any favours here, being "owned" by someone is the abusive thing, the fact its "legal" doesnt change that i dont give a flying fuck what the law says, law is itself an oppressive force; fuck laws,
@kirby @zaire @ivan i wouldnt mind if caretakers were actually caretakers and not just "i get to decide everything for you and disregard your rights and override your autonomy at every turn" which is what they actually are .. yes, i wouldnt mind non-oppressive caretakers but someone who actively oppresses me labeled "caretaker" can go fuck off actually ive had enough of that in my life
@Li@tech.lgbt @kirby@freerobuxextremist.com @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be bedtime isnt abuse, regulating what content your child consumes as a parent isnt abuse, and unrestricted computer access to a 6 year old is neglect. im not going to argue this because it should be common sense lol
@ivan @kirby @zaire both those examples violate autonomy, so yes it is, no amount of wrapping it up in "im hurting you to protect you" makes it not
-- the fact that it has to be forced upon them shows it to be .. the fact the response is typically try get around this bullshit highlights it,
we dont get around and evade helpful shit.
@zaire@fedi.absturztau.be dont worry guys zivi is here to save us from the non-profit that is working on a genuinely useful, optional tool for parents who aren't neglectful enough to give their kids unrestricted internet access
@ivan block number 2 coming right up, congratulations, you’re the fucking problem!! actually, gonna report too to boot
@zaire@fedi.absturztau.be yeah no as an aspiring father i'd love having a feature like this instead of your average proprietary spyware lol i dunno what your problem is with basic parenting. good luck with the report
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be no one ever said this
@ivan @zaire it is functionally identical to spyware to the point where AV vendors have to explicitly whitelist it because it reports information to "parents" instead of some vaigue "hackers" and you see their "allowed" .. ..
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be spyware exfiltrates your data to unknown third parties for profit without your knowledge. parental controls report to the parent who owns the computer and set it up. these are not the same thing by any meaningful definition
@ivan @zaire "exfiltrate data" .. yes; to "unknown third parties" .. can be and often is setup without your knowledge, so yes.
"for profit" .. this was never a requirement the spyware your ex installs on your pc to track your future partners isnt "for profit" for example,
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be a parent setting up their own computer is not comparable to an abusive ex installing stalkerware, that's insane lol
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be it's your parents computer and you're 8
@ivan @zaire "your a socially acceptable target" no fuck off actually;
"its your parents computer" that is used primarily by you, all the time, making your "ownership" more akin to that of a landlord than actual ownership;
.. or its a computer that you have a "you" user on, which is deliberately locked down and setup to track you??
@nu@ko.she-a.eu @Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be this thread is so funny because theyve compared (explicitly and implicitly) parental controls so far to things like:
- authoritarian censorship
- spyware
- abuse
- slavery essentially ("someone who owns you")
@ivan @zaire @nu its spyware because it would be considered spyware if it was targeted at anyone else and the only reason im supposed to consider it "not spyware" is because those doing the spying are "allowed too"
its authoritarian censorship becuase it is litterally an authority figure, deciding for someone else, what information they can / cannot access;
its abuse because it is done to unwilling participants who do not want this, you are "doing things to someone they dont want done to them" .. its just im supposed to consider you "allowed" which i dont
finally "ownership" in this case is merely "the purpose of a system is what it does" being applied to all authority figures, those who are under their ""authority"" .. they decide what happens to them, their not allowed to do what they actually want; and im supposed to see that as normal and fine, not follow your demands is "bad" hence, "ownership"
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu by this logic a doctor examining you is assault, a teacher giving you homework is forced labor, and a seatbelt law is authoritarian body control. you've really just defined all authority as illegitimate and called it an argument you know, i recommend you dont use terms like "authoritarian censhorship" if you dont know what it means. the watering down of serious political language is a real problem, when everything is fascism and bedtime is authoritarian censorship, you've got nothing left when actual authoritarianism shows up anyway
@ivan @zaire @nu a doctor examining you ** without consent ** is assault yes;
a teacher giving you homework just is forced labour, nothing more to add there;
seatbelt laws are authoritarian body control, you dont need laws for that; the only people whod be effected by it are those who wouldnt do so consentually;
and yes all authoirty is illegitmate, "illegitimate" isnt even the right word that implies it could be legitimate let me make this clear: being arbitarily "allowed to" override consent is abusive and controlling; even if done to "socially acceptable" targets..
congrats your starting to undetstand something so unbeleivably basic !
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu so no seatbelts and no doctors, got it. very normal position
no forced seatbelts*
no doctors looking at you when you've explicitly told them not too*
whats that? not wanting someone going weird ass examining you without consent isnt actually unreasonable at all?
also doctors shouldnt be authority figures that is itself a problem, saying thats a problem is not "no doctors" no less than saying parents being one is "no parents" .. its "you should not have power over people" and "you cant just override my autonomy or consent" which isnt unreasonable in the slightest;
its demanding that you be able to do that which is actually.
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu the seatbelt thing
@ivan @zaire @nu ? yes i dont think people should be forced to wear a seatbelt "for their safety" especially using a system where not doing so results in them being intentionally harmed by the state, (which totally isnt harming you its JUST sending armed guys with guns to your house to abduct you then treating you as subhuman for 10+ years) but you see, like parents they are "allowed too" and so totally not abusive or controlling whatsoever! please turn a blind eye to this!
if seatbelts are so good you dont need to force people to wear them, and you generally dont actually; if your forcing people to wear them, that is when it becomes abusive? ....... dont try control people?
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu this started about gnome
@nu @zaire @ivan yes trading a theretical accident that may or may not happen for "definitely yes people being harmed right now and were the ones doing it" is fucked actually
drunk driving is an issue primarily because of a lack of alternatives for travel, god forbid your away from home maybe drunk but you still need to get home, you have no other fucking options, you have taxis and shit but they both require having money on hand which isnt always actually possible, offering other options would be real harm reduction, deliberately causing harm becuase something "might" happen, never is; thanks;
@nu @zaire @ivan public transit has the same issue of needing imaginary points to be able to access any of it, which if you do not have then you are shit out of luck, not to mention your car still being there and getting fined to heck for leaving it there, or for towing it away or .. cars are themsleves part of the issue id say too, another is the concept of "bars" in general; where you actually go to get drunk, but at no point would my "soultion" be to establish an insitution that commits violence against anyone who doesnt follow my demands .. nor would i ever suggest such a thing is magically fine because its them doing it .. :shrug:
@nu @zaire @ivan im not even american, but sure; the solution would differ from place to place, either way in no way is the solution to have an orginization thats just "allowed too" hurt you whenever it wants because you didnt follow its demands. which is what "laws" are, it doesnt actually change that point at all, yes laws break your autonomy, thats their entire point.. we should address issues without doing that? .. you loosing your shit at what basically amounts to "ACAB" .. kinda shows that .. you might be a cop?
@Li @zaire @ivan you have no idea how much ive traveled by bus illegally when i had no money,, now bus drivers look at me weird when i go to pay for my ride after 2000 so yea its a very regional thing that is very self-centric to say that drunk driving should be legalized, instead of only pushing for laws that promote the wellbeing of everyone,,, like what kinda person are you to be pro-drunk-driving, atp i must assume youre 14
@nu @zaire @ivan im not "pro drunk driving" im anti-laws;
becuase laws are enforced via systemic violence and mistreatment but its okay becuase their "allowed too", its okay becuase they claim "authority" over you, "only pushing for laws that promote the well-being of everyone" such laws cannot exist; as "laws" function by threatening your well-being (i prefer calling them 'threats' or 'demands' to not give any resemblance of legitimacy to them.)
in this case its especially dumb its "dont do this you might hurt someone" which is fair, but then it turns into " if we catch you doing this were going to hurt someone" so .. your just adding extra risk to doing it, and not solving anything
anyway so your solution in this case is .. i have to choose between traveling illegally and traveling illegally? .. great solution /j cant imagine why some might choose the "wrong" .. "travelling illegally" option when presented with these two
@Li @zaire @ivan i am against punitive laws same but like the solution is rehabilitative laws, not abolishing all rules of the social contract?? like if someone commits a murder i dont want them to sit in prison for their life, but i dont want them to have nothing done against them, the solution is to rehabilitate them to be fit for society, and this applies to most laws, the objective should be to get people to be better participants into society
you must be missing a part of your reasoning to believe that an anarchic society would be rule-less, there are rules in any sort of society of any animal because you need a standard of decency in order to cohabitate with anyone no matter who or what you are
@nu @zaire @ivan "im against punitive laws" "but things have to be done against them" then your not .. "against punitive laws" your for them as long as the state sanctioned abuse looks the right way to you; which is obvious given things so far;
how about we make "soceity" better able to accomodate certain people rather than trying to force people to conform to "society" (also lets just skip over the notion that "state/other authoirty sanctioned violence and abuse" is "soceity")
im not saying things should be "ruleless" you added that part, your conflating "laws" with "social norms" which are two different things .. im against specifically, violating autonomy, no matter what way you try obscure it, this means im against laws in general, im against authority figures and so on "this is how i want to be treated" is fine, you conflating that with "treating people properly" is a you issue,
@Li@tech.lgbt @nu@ko.she-a.eu @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be OMG IM DYING I LITERALLY CALLED THIS
@ivan @zaire @nu .. https://tech.lgbt/@Li/116251762649001308 actually i called it, i dont know how you can read me offering solutions for drunk driving that arent violating autonomy as "supporting drunk driving" .. i could guess you would do so anyway.
@nu@ko.she-a.eu @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @Li@tech.lgbt inb4 they defend drunk driving
@nu@ko.she-a.eu @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @Li@tech.lgbt it's like complaining that the ATM is violating your autonomy because you can only use the banking program and cant open cmd.exe
@ivan @zaire @nu except i can just goto another fucking computer and the bank doesnt own and control every device i have access too? (i mean obligatory fuck banks) secondly the bank atm isnt my personal property (probably..)
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu so can the kid, we call it going to a friend's house. and the parent doesn't own every device either, just the family computer, which is literally the point
@ivan @zaire @nu so its still the norm that its got that shit setup .. the only time you can actually be free and not deal woth shit is on a rare occasion you goto someone elses house that doesnt have all the same bullshit you have setup ?
yeah sounds like a prison ..
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu sounds like childhood...
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu lol no im not looking to raise a prisoner thanks
@ivan @zaire @nu clearly yes as clearly demonstrated by your desire to control their every action online, and to dictate every moment of their daily routine like when they goto bed; your right not prison warden behaviour at all :)
@Li@tech.lgbt @zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @nu@ko.she-a.eu yes i will be setting a bedtime for my 6 year old, this is normal
@ivan @zaire @nu and i will call you a shit parent for it and will not get mad at your child for not following your demands? .. i hope your child rm -rf's your shit out of existence and can escape?
abusive controlling shit being normalized doesnt make it not abusive or controlling; it just makes it a systemic issue;
physically beating your children to submission was also "normal" once; now just emotionally doing so is for some reason .. because again as it stands currently "parents" are considered to basically own you; and its "just parenting" .. i have no power over you, but you have power over someone else, and thats the issue;
but, like all authoirty figures their allowed to just harm you and its fine somehow; the "authority is illegitimate" is the "weird argument" not the "i am socially allowed to violate you whenever i feel like it" because of course;
fuck you,
how do I remember to post here
@fireweed I wouldn’t treat it as an obligation. Habits are hard to form from things we hate.
@NullNowhere it’s not that I hate it.
I just am so focused on mastodon when I should come here and enjoy the vibes too.
I need to find people to follow that would do it
not to kinkshame, but still
I think I'll take the money!
@Kingu If I take the dinner and he doesn’t show up, do I automatically get the trillion?
Because unironically I’ve got things to say and I need some answers. Because having the power to fix things and just looking at it all…
If a person came up to an accident, and they had a cellphone, and didn’t call for help. Then we’d think that is a bad person.
He's good at platitudes.
@NaraMoore @Kingu Knowing the guy exists would be a thing I guess. But I’m pretty much expecting the money.
can we get language to describe a project that we worked on but that are not the sole creator/developer of, (and i cant use ours or other plural pronouns, because lol im plural)
...I'm not sure i was supposed to read it like that...
The government seems hell-bent on making life miserable for a very small and very harmless portion of the population, so today's Low Quality Ad is for this I Love My Trans Friends pin. Just be nice to people. It's not hard. It is actually very easy.
https://collabs.shop/6b7tgy
@lowqualityfacts cheese isn't a fruit? But I'm lactose intolerant and been eating as all of my 5 a day!!! 😛💖
ouchies leg i did my last (im) injection into suddenly started hurting sharply and ouchiesss while walking
(its better now btw but why did it have to do that when i had 20 minutes of walking in front of me, and also like 24 hours after the injection)
Mon pere a fait une demande d'aide a mourir. C'est aujourd'hui qie va se passe.
L'infirmière est ici pour installer un catheter.
C'est un feeling étrange...
Ma mere l'habille et le lave.
Moi je suis stressé a fond.
C'est en ttain de se faire.
Je suis dams la salle d'attente. Je veux pas voir ca. Les aitres memnres de ma gamille spnt resté fans la piece.
J'ai braillé ma vie...
Désolé pour les messages a l'orthographe douteuse. Tapper sur un telephone nest pas mas specialité
Quelle journée de fou!
lightweight: only 1 gb ram needed!get this js dev outta here now, and i'm not gonna say this twice
#Console command of the day: factor
Type in "factor <number>" and you get all the #prime factors of the number.
This command is part of the #GNU #coreutils so if you’re on a GNU/#Linux system, you should already have it.
random ass fact ukrainian DSTU4735:2007 regulations on ice cream mandate that ice cream below 285g (there very specific on that part) in weight
@vox spoon flavor
@0x6e6174@mastodon.catgirl.cloud oh and yea it must be checked for radiation quarterly and for estradiol-17 content?????
While I don't have a "context window" in human terms [...]now this is next level AI bullshit
@Kingu I mean ignoring how dumb it is conceptually, and the general issues with death penalties. Just ignoring those.
How many suicide bombers have there been in the UK in the last tens years?
I mean giving her more benefit than she deserves (stop wasting tax payer money on non issues) one could argue that planning a suicide bombing should carry that sentence. Or preferably those at the top of the chain.
But even then it feels like just blabbering right wing word salad.